1) On Wednesday night the Amazon and I had the incredible pleasure of seeing John Cleese perform a one-man show — basically a cherrypicked retrospective of his career. I still can’t quite process the fact that he was actually there, and we saw him. Him. John Cleese, for the love of God. The most remarkable thing about the show, I think, was his ability to come across as simultaneously friendly and incredibly urbane. And although I’m sure he could give the lecture in his sleep, he managed to give an impression of talking conversationally with the audience. He told us that his mother lived to be 101, and he seems scheduled for similar longevity; I wish I had as much energy now as he seems to have at the age of 70.
2) I have noticed recently that my new favorite phrase appears to be: “I think that ship has sailed.” This is quite useful for sardonic/ironic effect, and is also a useful way to tell someone that he or she is an idiot without being explicit. I am observing the departure of so many ships that I am beginning to feel a strange kinship with Helen of Troy.
3) Recently I started re-reading Irvin Yalom’s book Love’s Executioner, the classic/famous account of himself and ten psychotherapy clients and how they impacted one another in the therapy process. My second encounter with the book has really reminded me, as if I needed reminding, that the reader brings as much to the book as the author does. The first time I read the book, which was maybe ten years ago, I found it interesting and entertaining. This time around, from the perspective of someone who has been in extremely demanding and intensive therapy for more than two years, my reaction is that I’m grateful this egotistical asshole isn’t my therapist. I know people usually praise Yalom for showing the “humanity” of the therapist’s role, but I’m not sure I’m inspired by knowing that he thinks of one of his clients as “a ninny,” and that he practically wallows in his disgust for fat women — and refers to this disgust in the present tense; it’s not something he’s gotten past. Of course I understand that therapists bring their own crap into the therapy relationship; that’s the basis for countertransference, and in some instances, it can be useful. I also know that the clients gave their permission for their stories to be told, and so they must think that they were helped — and in many ways I’m sure they were; healing is always a hit and miss process administered by one imperfect human being to another. Some of the book really made me wonder, though, where the therapist should ethically draw the line as far as refusing to work with clients for whom the therapist does not have a genuine and natural empathy.
One of the points he makes in the story “Fat Lady” is that he took on his fat client, Betty, even though she revolted him so much that he couldn’t look at her, because he wanted an opportunity to grow as a therapist and to work out the countertransference she brought up in him … and that he could only grow this way through the therapeutic relationship. Well, sorry — I call bullshit on that one. If we consider the therapist’s countertransference to be what the rest of us non-therapists experience as projection, then none of us would ever be able to work through anything outside of therapy. I have daily opportunities to become aware of , observe, and try to wrestle honestly with my trigger points and projections — to see where my irritations, hatreds, and judgments show me to myself in ways I’d rather not see. If Yalom really needs to have a fragile psyche at his disposal in order to work out his own stuff, then he is, I think, irresponsible. I would never for a moment deny that therapists are challenged by and learn from their clients. But for a therapist to take on a client he finds disgusting simply because she provides a countertransference challenge? I can’t accept that as ethical. Did he help her? Yes. But this is one story, and I wonder how many other disgusting clients he took on and didn’t help due to his own issues getting in the way of the crucial concept of unconditional positive regard from analyst to analysand. It’s impossible to give unconditional positive regard and still find someone too disgusting to look at.
However, one thing I did find to be interesting and useful about the book was his observations about different degrees of resistance to the therapy process. It actually made me appreciate myself more as a therapy client; I am not guarded or defensive, I’m not in denial, and I welcome conversations and observations that make me feel painful or uncomfortable, because I recognize those experiences as points to guide me more clearly toward places where I am still wounded in ways that I need to look at. I’m very good at recognizing that surge of anger or irritation in me is a surefire indicator that the truth has been spoken — and in fact, I frequently verbalize that when my therapist suggests an interpretation or direction: “I don’t think that’s right, because it’s not pissing me off,” or, conversely, “That bothers me, so there’s almost certainly something there; I’ll think about that and tell you what I figure out.” And then I go away and spend hours processing that information, and getting as close to the truth as my mind will allow, and I come back and present the next layer of information — a little deeper, a little more risky, a little scarier each time; each of those risks takes off a layer of scar tissue and gets closer to allowing that wound to breathe so it can start healing differently, rather than being buried. At any rate, if Yalom’s book did nothing else, it showed me that most therapy clients don’t show up in quite that way from Day One, and so I gained a new gratitude for my willingness to endure the discomfort of disassembling my miswired psyche … or maybe a new gratitude for my realization that this miswiring has me stuck in ways that I don’t want to live with all my life, despite being more functional than most people I see. I’m very grateful not to have been fooled by my functionality into thinking I’m healthy; it seems that’s something that people often get tripped up by, and they waste a lot of life, until they have a crisis and realize that functionality is a surface phenomenon, whereas life is lived elsewhere.

