1) This week I acquired two excruciating copyediting projects, both of which I considered turning down; but then I realized I couldn’t bypass the $1200 I’ll make by suffering through them, especially now that I may have to pay a real estate client $5000 for a mistake I didn’t really make, but which a judge will nail me for if it goes to court … so I’d rather settle with the client privately before it gets to that point. Therefore, I’m working a second job to be able to afford my first job.
Anyway, the book I started on first is a political thriller (I use the term very loosely indeed) about a secret operative doing something with the Middle East. It’s so incoherent that I can’t follow the plot, but at least it will be incoherent and properly punctuated by the time I’m done with it. The author has no idea how to punctuate dialogue, and he runs it all together in a paragraph, so I have to both correct it and try to pick out who is saying what, in order to indent properly … which is more easily said than done, in many cases. The dialogue itself is absolutely mind-numbing. Every single time the main character — code name “Ricochet” — enters a new situation, there’s a dialogue block similar to this:
Ricochet walked into the bank. There was a young woman behind the desk. “Hello,” he said.
“Hello,” she said.
“My name is Paul Snow and I am here to see Mr. Wells Fartgo, the bank manager,” Ricochet said, using his operative name. He did not introduce himself by his code name.
“I do not know if Mr. Fartgo is in,” the woman behind the desk said. She picked up her intercom phone. “Mr. Fartgo, there is a Mr. Snow here to see you. Are you available to see Mr. Snow? You are? Thank you.” She turned back to Ricochet. “Mr. Fartgo can see you in five minutes. Can you take a seat in the lobby please, Mr. Snow?” she asked
“Thank you. I am very happy that Mr. Fartgo can see me in five minutes. I will sit in the lobby until he is ready,” he said.
“Thank you. I will call you when Mr. Fartgo is available,” she said.
… and so forth. Except that before I work on it, it looks like this:
Ricochet walked into the bank. There was a young woman behind the desk. “Hello.” He said. “Hello.” She said. “My name is Paul Snow and I am here to see Mr. Wells Fartgo, the bank manager.” Ricochet said, using his operative name. He did not introduce himself by his code name.”I do not know if Mr. Fartgo is in.” The woman behind the desk said. She picked up her intercom phone. “Mr. Fartgo, there is a Mr. Snow here to see you. Are you available to see Mr. Snow? You are? Thank you.” She turned back to Ricochet. “Mr. Fartgo can see you in five minutes. Can you take a seat in the lobby please, Mr. Snow?”She asked.”Thank you. I am very happy that Mr. Fartgo can see me in five minutes. I will sit in the lobby until he is ready.” He said.”Thank you. I will call you when Mr. Fartgo is available.”She said.
2) Yesterday I drove down to Eugene to enjoy a wonderful performance of Haydn’s “The Creation,” which was part of the Oregon Bach Festival. (Thank you, PP, for taking me.) On my way down, there was a smartarsed little shit in a sports car behind me in the fast lane. There was some road construction, so there was a lot of stopping and starting. I had the proper three car lengths between me and the car ahead of me, but Mr. Convertible was riding my tail the whole time, and more than once had to veer off into the shoulder to avoid hitting me. I thought about changing lanes to get away from him, but then I started hoping he would hit me; I’ve ruined my back bumper by misgauging the location of posts, rocks, walls, and similar nonvehicular inanimate objects when backing out of parking spaces. How wonderful it would be, I thought, if he hit me and paid for my new bumper. But of course, that didn’t happen. I felt cheated.
3) Recently I watched the film adaptation of Doubt whilst trotting on my treadmill, and I was very disappointed by it. Meryl Streep was wonderful, as she always is, but Philip Seymour Hoffman was woefully miscast as Father Flynn — who is a good-looking, athletic, Pied Piper of boys in the original play. I was enormously irritated by the painfully obvious visual “cues” in the film … oh, how very ironic that Sister Aloysius, searching for truth, keeps having to replace a burned-out bulb in her office! Gosh, the film should come with an Anvil of Unsubtlety so the viewer can whack himself over the head with it at suitable intervals. There was also a moment in the film that reminded me of something that annoys me in film generally speaking … characters who cry, and who have snot running out of their noses as they do so. Does anyone *ever* do this in real life, when in the presence of someone they don’t know very well? I really don’t think so. Sure, sniffling would perhaps spoil the dialogue, but then again, so do snail-tracks of mucus on film.
June 28, 2009 at 4:32 am |
I haven’t seen Doubt yet, but it’s one that is on my list. Fortunately, I will now be appropriately prepared for snail-tracks of mucus!
June 28, 2009 at 8:46 am |
Hey, that’s what I’m here for.
June 28, 2009 at 6:21 am |
1) Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! Dialogue often makes or breaks a book for me and I’d either throw the book away (if I’d bought it), return it to the library, or, if I were paid to fix this, maim myself (please don’t – it’s hyperbole!). You have my complete sympathy.
2) Some people are so inconsiderate.
3) There are few things more irritating than something unsubtle and clever dumbed down in a different venue, whether it be a book or a play. I even hate it when I’ve seen something portrayed say, on stage, so brilliantly, so perfectly portrayed elsewhere mundanely by someone else. I’m sure everyone did their best, but I still feel cheated, like it isn’t the same play.
June 28, 2009 at 6:23 am |
PS Real people do cry with tracks of mucus running down their faces, EVEN if their sniffling and no matter who is watching. It can be done without knowing you’re doing it, too.
I’ve seen it frequently and, yes, in adults.
June 28, 2009 at 8:45 am
Do they really? Well, I stand corrected. I would shoot myself before I allowed such a thing to happen, so of course, I’m looking at it from a different perspective.
June 28, 2009 at 7:02 am |
There are many slugs on our property. They skate on tracks of mucus. Mucus skiing will replace water skiing and skateboarding and snow skiing and snow boarding as the next hip sport for young people.
June 28, 2009 at 8:45 am |
That’s … a visual I won’t quickly recover from.
June 28, 2009 at 9:13 am |
I’m with Stephanie…adults cry, snot flows.
and as far as “Doubt” goes, being that I did not read nor see the play and I love Philip Seymour Hoffman in general, I loved the film…totally loved it!!
but I had no preconceived notions…and that will kill a film and it’s generally the case that I will not watch one of my favorite plays or books when it’s adapted for the large screen…I’m always disappointed. Invariably.
June 28, 2009 at 8:27 pm |
I also usually follow the “don’t see film if story already viewed in different medium” rule, though I have had the occasional pleasant surprise … the film of “American Psycho,” for example, really captured the book surprisingly well. But those pleasant surprises are rare.
June 28, 2009 at 12:33 pm |
1. Aaarrrggghhh!!!! indeed. I could barely get through your post on this dialogue, let alone a whole book of it. Good luck to you.
June 28, 2009 at 8:27 pm |
I’m on page 50, and I need to be shot with a tranquilizer gun to put me out of my misery.
July 1, 2009 at 11:40 am
What? a tranquilizer gun? Not a shot of stimulant to keep you from falling face first into a coma of boredom?
June 28, 2009 at 2:11 pm |
I do feel you should get a form of mental danger money for tackling the particularly duff manuscripts. That dialogue is painful on so many levels (though I hesitate to criticise, dialogue not being a speciality of mine and recalling stones and glass houses and all). Funnily enough, I have seen an adult man cry without wiping his nose – I remember it because it did shock me somewhat.
June 28, 2009 at 8:28 pm |
It really is painful. It’s downright criminal.
And I suppose people do drip whilst weeping, but damn, if it were me, I’d get a freaking Kleenex, or even use my sleeve if I had to. Blecch.
June 28, 2009 at 5:32 pm |
1. Good god. Who ARE these people? And WHAT ON EARTH makes them think they can write?
2. I love tapping my brake lights unexpectedly when someone is tail-gating me. Especially at night. Just to keep them on their toes.
3. I have to say I avoided this film at the cinema and I have avoided it on DVD, too. Sounds like my instincts were good.
June 28, 2009 at 8:29 pm |
1) I don’t know. And I don’t know.
2) I should have done that … he would have rear-ended me for sure.
3) Yeah.
July 1, 2009 at 11:41 am
Ooh! oo! You can get them to rear end you better by using your emergency brake to suddenly slow down. It doesn’t make your brake lights go on. . .
June 28, 2009 at 6:42 pm |
Reading through your last few posts has convinced me that everyone in the world is shit (except you) and you need to take a damn long holiday.
June 28, 2009 at 8:30 pm |
Everyone in the world is shit except for me and my enormously kind and supportive readers. And my cats.
And yes, I could use a very long holiday, possibly in a sanatorium for the mentally unhinged.
June 29, 2009 at 4:43 am
You’d stick out in a sanatorium – you’re too sane.
June 28, 2009 at 6:43 pm |
I would detour to watch Philip Seymour Hoffmann read the phone book, but I had wondered myself about his match for the role.
As for Mr. Wells Fartgo… it scorches my knickers that I didn’t think of that name myself in several contexts where I could have used it… of course, back-to-back quotation brackets have their place, if you are trying to create a headlong or collated sense of dialogue, like characters singing over one another ensemble.
But I doubt seriously that craft was involved in the case of this writer.
Snot happens, but in the case of crying fits, only when the cryer is concerned with being ostentatious about his misery. Or so experience leads me to believe.
June 28, 2009 at 8:32 pm |
I loved him so much in “State and Main” (to which I privately refer as “Mate and Stain”). He’s very talented, but … an awkward fit for this part, I do believe.
I’ve done the quotation mark onslaught as well, to create an atmosphere of confusion in crowd scenes, but somehow I doubt that this writer had that in mind. He’s also made some marvelous malaprops, including “arraignment” for “arrangement,” and “annalist” for “analyst.”
June 29, 2009 at 8:40 pm
I must dig up the World War II thriller in my collection that mentions the “Farben brothers” of the manufacturing combine I. G. Farben.
June 28, 2009 at 7:45 pm |
1) *trying not to bang head on keyboard.*
2) @ Woo, if you put on your parking lights, it has the same effect without putting your bumper at risk.
3) Ick! I’ll pass.
June 28, 2009 at 8:33 pm |
My keyboard is practically destroyed from the repeated banging I’ve been inspired to do by this job.
June 30, 2009 at 2:46 pm |
2) My dad occasionally tells the story of when he was in his 20’s and had installed a toggle switch in his car for turning on his back-up lights, as there was some sort of short causing them not to work when he shifted into reverse. One day, he was on the highway and a car kept tailgating. He tried motioning the driver to go around, slowing down, etc., and nothing worked. Finally he let the car get good and close and then flipped that toggle switch. All he could see in his rear view was that car skidding all over the place.
Looking back, it was obviously dangerous and not a wise thing to do, but it’s such a funny story, and nobody got hurt. And the guy backed off and followed at a reasonable distance after that.
June 28, 2009 at 10:17 pm |
I know it’s stating the obvious, but that has got to be the worst writing. Ever.
Second: “the film should come with an Anvil of Unsubtlety so the viewer can whack himself over the head with it at suitable intervals.”
ANVIL OF UNSUBTLETY?! LOLOLOL!
June 28, 2009 at 10:23 pm |
One would think it is the worst writing ever, and yet, I can attest to the fact that far worse things come across my desk via the POD. Some jobs I do actually turn down, telling my handler that “This manuscript made me lose the will to live.”
I’m thinking I should invent and market that anvil. There are so many circumstances in which I can picture it being useful.
June 30, 2009 at 2:41 pm |
I cracked up at that part, too.
June 30, 2009 at 2:42 pm
The Anvil of Unsubtlety, I mean.
June 29, 2009 at 1:10 am |
the book you’re editing sounds mind-numbingly boring. Surely no one is going to pay good money to read it…..
June 29, 2009 at 4:08 am |
i)I can sympathise re the manuscript. Wading through very medicore stuff at the moment. But tha dialogue is awful.
ii)I think it’s a matter of focus. Yeah for the Haydn. Ignore the tailgater (easier said than done).
iii) I think you’re onto something there with the Anvil. I’ll take mine in black (but make it out of plastic so that I don’t get too much of a headache).
June 29, 2009 at 8:58 pm |
1) WOW! That book sounds wonderful. I wonder what will happen to Mr. Snow. Will it be 5 minutes, or will it be more. Maybe he won’t get to see Mr. Fartgoe at all. Oh, the suspense! Tell me when it is published or when I can order an advanced copy from Amazon. *End Sarcasm*
2) I’ve sorta had that same experience. Know, what to do? Stop short. It freaks them out. I’ve never been hit, but I sure was ready to lay into them if they did.
June 29, 2009 at 9:33 pm |
The $5000 “mistake” isn’t that painful house story you posted last week is it? Paul.
June 30, 2009 at 1:06 am |
1. I can’t help it. I feel waaaay better about my own MS now. Such a guilty pleasure, these little treats from the frontline of POD publishing.
2. Why are sports car drivers always obnoxious tools?
3. I can’t bring myself to rent Doubt on DVD. It has the most woefully unappealing cover I have ever seen. It just screams misery for all involved.
July 1, 2009 at 11:47 am |
1. I keep wondering why this dialogue ever got written in the first place?
2. When I am annoyed by tailgaters I generally pull over and let them pass me so I can watch them annoy the next car in line. Despite the temptation to get them to rear end me, I keep reminding myself that it takes a lot of time to be in an accident, even a small fender-bender. And anyone as obnoxious as that guy was probably doesn’t actually have insurance either.
3. I’ve almost given up on any movies made later than 1970. consequently your reference to Hoffman did not bring any image to mind. I liked the Anvil of Unsubtlety, although using it on myself seems rather too painful. Shouldn’t you be using it on the screenplay writer, the producer, and the director?
July 3, 2009 at 2:51 pm |
OMG! T M I
“She laughed when she read #1 and #2,” said Ivory, “But eeuuuuu, couldn’t handle the one about bodily fluids running amuk.”
First time to your blog, David. It was recommend by another blogger. Crazy funny!
July 4, 2009 at 4:46 pm |
I should have had a snot advisory posted at the beginning of the article.
July 4, 2009 at 8:26 pm
For this afternoon: boogers early, sinus drainage at rush hour?
July 4, 2009 at 1:24 pm |
1) They are not paying you enough. I doubt they could afford to pay you what having read books like that is worth.
2) I drive a tank, a 1983 Crown Vic. I’m more wary about killing the people around me, since most of the cars around me are made of plastic. I am sorry that the person behind you just reckless enough to be annoying, but not enough so that you could buy a new bumper. Perhaps you need a bumper sticker “Go ahead, it’s insured.”
3) For Hollywood the question of popular actor vs actor who actually fits the role is an easy one. Theatre goers are accustomed to subtlety, when you don’t have close ups or CGI you can only make yourself so clear. Movie-goers are used to being spoon-fed every plot element. I suppose that’s where the anvil comes in.
July 5, 2009 at 11:15 am |
Argh. In my experience, people do not leak mucus when they cry but they DO use contractions when they speak.
JD at I Do Things
July 5, 2009 at 7:54 pm |
I have dialed 911 in Portland, Oregon. (I live in a neighboring state, but I used the area code for Portland.) I consider David’s current situation to be something of a crisis, so I called the emergency line.
http://modestypress.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/new-permanent-first-post-on-my-blog/
This may even give you a reason not to send him a shareware payment.
July 6, 2009 at 11:37 am |
1. Mr. Fartgo?!? I’m sure that’s been commented on already, but I thought surely you must have been exaggerating the awfulness of the dialogue for our reading pleasure.
No?
3. You’re going to be disappointed if you keep going to these s’posed to be highbrow leviathan’s that lack any self-reflexive humility or a discernible sense of humor. May I just make a recommendation? Skip you the next artsy-ass drama, and rent yourself ‘Ice Age’ (the first one). You won’t be disappointed.
July 11, 2009 at 8:19 pm |
Mr. Fartgo? Please let me know when this toe is available, I must read it.
Keep your movie viewing simple: The new thriller, Mega Shark versus Giant Octopus starring Lorenzo Lamas looks very promising.
July 13, 2009 at 11:52 am |
I was just sitting here moaning to myself over having to fix a bunch of improperly embedded endnotes in the manuscript about French labor history. Then I read that dialogue sample and realized I have nothing at all to whine about. Buck up, soldier