For the past week, I’ve been completely drowned in the life and works of Fryderyk Chopin, whose music I have never particularly liked (except for the Nocturnes and Etudes) but with whom I am obliged to become reacquainted for the sake of the project I’m working on. I treated myself to a volume of his collected letters, which have become my favorite reading material lately; while I am not his number-one fan in a musical sense, his personality absolutely delights me. Chopin was a highly complex, extremely intelligent, fussy, gossipy, charming elitist with a wicked tongue and an often deadpan sardonic sense of humor. I’ve always thought that if I’d met him, we would have hit it off famously. His letters are a fascinating revelation both of his character and of the times he lived in; they range from beautifully tender epistles to beloved friends and family to imperious, spoiled-brat instructions to his friend Julian Fontana who was his factotum in Paris while Chopin was in Nohant and Majorca with George Sand. Interwoven with his personal life are amazing insights about the nature of creativity and art. Even if you have no interest in music, Chopin’s letters are worth reading; they are a marvelous autobiography, a first-hand portrait of a bygone age, and a testament to how much we, as a society, are lacking now that we no longer write letters.
Here are some random passages I appreciated:
(from 1825) I have seen the whole house where Copernicus was born, certainly a little profaned at present. Imagine, Jasio, in that corner, in that very room, where that famous astronomer received the gift of life, stands now the bed of some German who probably, after eating too many potatoes, often emits many zephyrs.
(from 1825) Papa and I were invited to Jaworek’s the day before yesterday, to partake of a “lax.” On receiving this invitation, I at first thought he had been seized by diarrhoea and was offering me the same; but later, when the “lax” was brought out to show how big it was and how many persons could eat it, I found that it was a salmon (in German, “lachs”) which had been sent to him from Danzig.
(from 1830) About the first concert: the hall was full, and both boxes and stalls were sold out three days beforehand, but it did not produce on the mass of the audience the impression I expected. The first Allegro is accessible only to the few; there were some bravos, but I think only because they were puzzled: – What is this??? — and had to pose as connossieurs.
(from 1830) You must know that in that article the Official Bulletin declared that the Poles should be as proud of me as the Germans are of Mozart; obvious nonsense. But in the same article the writer says that if I had fallen into the hands of some pedant or Rossinist — which is a stupid term — I should not have been what I am. I am nothing, but he is right in saying that, if I had not been taught by Elsner, who imbued me with convictions, I should doubtless have accomplished still less than I now have.
(from 1830) Next week I shan’t be able to refrain from abusing you for the thing I ought to have written about today, and that will be enough. I don’t want anything from you, not even a handshake; I’m disgusted with you for ever. You’re a Hellish Monster.
(from 1831) Everything I have seen abroad till now seems to me old and hateful, and just makes me sigh for home, for those blessed moments that I didn’t know how to value. The people here are not my people; they’re kind, but kind from habit; they do everything too respectably, flatly, moderately. I don’t even want to think of moderation. I’m puzzled, I’m melancholy. I don’t know what to do with myself.
(from 1831) People in Paris are odd; as soon as evening comes, you hear nothing but voices calling out the titles of new chapbooks; sometimes you can buy 3, 4 sheets of rubbish for a sou … “The Art of Having Lovers and Keeping Them,” “The Love Affairs of Priests,” “The Archbishop of Paris with the Duchesse du Barry”, and a thousand other indecencies, sometimes very wittily written. It is really wonderful to see the methods people hit on here to earn a few pennies.
(from 1832) “La Tentation,” an opera-ballet by Halevy and Gide, has tempted no one of good taste, for it is as little interesting as your German diet is in unison with the spirit of this century.
(an undated note, written in Paris) My dear friend — something has happened to me (as the ladies say at home); I can’t spend the evening with you because of a superboring strange dinner without even truffles.
(from 1839, to Julian Fontana) When thinking of the decoration for the Paris apartment, choose a paper like my old one, for both rooms; but varnished and shiny, with a narrow dark green stripe for a border. For the vestibule something different, but good. If, however, there are any prettier and more fashionable papers, which you like and know that I shall also like, take them. I prefer them smooth, very clean and plain looking, rather than the common type. That is why I like pearl color; it is neither glaring nor common-looking. Have the grey curtains, that were in my study by the piano, hung in the vestibule; and in the bedroom the ones that were in the bedroom before, only underneath them hang the pale muslin ones that were under the grey ones. I should like to have the wardrobe in the bedroom, if there is a good place for it, unless the living-room looks too bare between the windows. If the red sofa that stood in the dining-room can hve white covers made of the same stuff as the chairs, it could be put in the drawing-room.
(from 1839, to Julian Fontana) You are a priceless creature. The apartment sounds splendid; only why is it so cheap? Isn’t there some very unpleasant thing about it? It is essential that it should not face north; weigh the conditions I gave you in my last letter, and if the apartment meets most of them, then take it. Once more, though — is it all right, does it not smell bad, or is it not dirty, or are there not so many neighbors that you can’t go to the privy alone? Write by the outgoing courier. Make a plan of the apartment. My comrade had a presentiment that you would find something; and I like what you write of it, but for heaven’s sake is it all right? Remember that for her it can’t be just anyhow. Think it all over, and make haste. Arrrange it, and God be with you. Follow your own intuition. Think it over, and decide. P.S. Is the apartment like anybody’s? Has Mardelle not a better one? But don’t let him influence your judgment.
(from 1846) Sometimes I am satisfied with my violoncello sonata, sometimes not. I throw it into the corner, then take it up again. One must have time to judge rightly. When one does a thing, it appears good, otherwise one would not write it. Only later comes reflection, and one discards or accepts the thing. Time is the best censor, and patience a most excellent teacher.
September 1, 2008 at 10:23 am |
Yes, now that you mention it, most definitely a different part of your brain. Erudite, meticulous, perfectionistic, professorial, very serious, not particularly fond of cats and, dare I surmise…British?
September 1, 2008 at 10:25 am |
We beg to state in the strongest possible terms that we are all very, very fond of cats. Other than that, dead on … even about being British.
September 1, 2008 at 10:41 am |
A glimpse of the past before civilization disappears in a miasma of emails, blogs, and twitters.
A couple of days ago I saw a beautiful young couple walking down the street together, side by side. Each was intently conducting a separate conversation (not with each other) on his and her own cell phone.
Although four-year-old Random Granddaughter is not allowed (most of the time) to watch television or (all the time) to use computers, when irritated with my child care last week, she picked up a cell phone and called her mommy at work to complain about Grandpa.
She also pretends to be sending and receiving email.
September 1, 2008 at 12:02 pm |
The year is 3008.
Though I disagree with many of Rochester’s opinions on the music of Chopin, I must agree that they would have made the best of friends. In Mr. Rochester’s recently unearthed blog,(Remember those, before the implants?) I found him to be intelligent, articulate, tragic, and at times wickedly funny…
September 1, 2008 at 2:34 pm |
“there were some bravos, but I think only because they were puzzled: – What is this??? — and had to pose as connossieurs.”
Heh. There are always a handful at any concert, of any musical genre. Or poetry reading. Or gallery showing. And apparently it has always been this way.
The excerpts re: the wallpaper and the apartment hunting make him sound like your doppelganger. Oh, the petty obsessing the two of you could have done together… you two could have had your own sitcom.
September 1, 2008 at 7:49 pm |
OK, I apologize about the cats. I just figured some part had to be allergic or something. But, here’s another bridge across that brain of yours: Julian Fontana may have been his “factotum,” which I had to look up, but in these letters he was most certainly acting as his real estate agent. Funny about that.
September 1, 2008 at 10:01 pm |
I’m not sure we should be too quick to assume all letters are a erudite as the few that have made it to today. I have a friend that posts old postcards and most are written with as little style and charm as your average text message.
Like classical music and classical literature, I think it’s a mistake to assume what has survived to today is indicative of the whole. In the past, only a handful of people could communicate in writing at all. Of those, only a select subset left words worth reading centuries (or even decades) later. Those housekeepers telling of their troubles with the masters linens and Oxford dullards writing dutiful letters home are lost, and quite rightly, to the maelstrom of time.
In 150 years, I think we’ll be surprised by the how much can actually be salvaged from our time and I think we might end up being surprised that it is the children’s book “I Wish I Were a Butterfly” or an overlooked genre author or a comic strip or a movie score composer.
There is no more brutal critic than time.
I’m trying to remember now. Is this pertinent?
September 1, 2008 at 10:01 pm |
It does seem that you and he would get along marvelously well. Thanks for sharing these–they were great fun to read!
September 1, 2008 at 11:34 pm |
They were fun to read, and I certainly heard echoes of something you’ve recently said in that last passage.
I see how this particular style of writing could be viewed as a dying species, and you sharing them maybe won’t change the tide, but it does make you a rare find as well. Someone who appreciates that era, that turn of language, the richness of looking into the frame of the past through the filter of a unique, intelligent perspective. This time has those unique, intelligent perspectives, too, but they’ll take on the flavor and aura of this point in human history.
That you can immerse yourself and share -then- with others, makes you one of a rare and dying breed of thought as well.
September 1, 2008 at 11:39 pm |
Teasp — Glad you enjoyed them. I’ve been laughing aloud for three days reading this stuff … of course not all of it is funny; some of his letters detail his knowledge of his imminent death, and are very hard to take. But overall, a vastly amusing character.
Steph — I know what you mean, but … I think in ages past, most people communicated more effectively and in a more literate way than they do now. If they were literate at all, they were trained to use language with a sensibility that is rare in modern schooling. They parsed sentences. They memorized miles and miles of poetry, and oratory. Granted, not everyone had this advantage, but the ones who did usually wrote quite well. Even if the only book they ever read was the Bible, they were reading the splendid King James translation, brimful of purple prose and gilded turns of phrase. Personally, I find even mundane correspondence prior to 1910 to have a great degree of charm, even when the writer isn’t a professinal charmer (as Chopin certainly was).
Squirrel — That hadn’t occurred to me, and it’s hilarious. No wonder I identified so strongly with those passages.
Jax — If you think those make him sound like my doppelganger, I should see if I can re-locate the astonishing passage in which he gives detailed instructions to Fontana regarding the purchase of a tin of foie gras, including an exact description of where he can find it in the store, and indeed even a little pencil sketch of the store, to make sure, apparently, that he doesn’t waste any time in trying to figure out how to identify it. Oh, what would’t I give for the opportunity to have a “superboring strange dinner” with Chopin!
Shawn — *snort* hahaha
Mr. R — That’s quite funny about your granddaughter tattling on you via cell phone. These kids today — they’re going to have us all executed if we’re not careful.
September 2, 2008 at 1:46 am |
All we need to do is save blogs like yours and Mr. Random’s and that will be all the brilliant correspondence needed for the future. Have you seen “Impromptu”? I don’t remember particularly liking Chopin as played by Hugh Grant, so if you haven’t seen it perhaps you shouldn’t. It’s mostly from George Sand’s perspective anyway.
September 2, 2008 at 1:48 am |
I have seen the film, and I loved it, though I would not have chosen Hugh Grant to play Chopin. However, I thought the film was wonderfully entertaining, and I loved Julian Sands as Liszt, and Bernadette Peters as his mistress.
September 2, 2008 at 5:06 am |
I don’t know much about him but from these excerpts, I like him.
You’re right about the lost art of correspondence. I think it is a great loss and probably one of the worst side effects of the Internet.
September 2, 2008 at 9:23 am |
Am — Thanks. As odd as this sounds, I consider it a great compliments to be thought of as a rare and dying breed. If you know what I mean, which I think you do.
Corina — Yeah. There’s something different about writing a letter by hand. It’s a whole ‘nother mindset.
September 2, 2008 at 12:29 pm |
It sounds like a great book and your excerpts were most amusing to read. And since my continually replenished book pile should keep me reading for the next hundred years or two, I will content myself with those choice morsels for now.
September 2, 2008 at 6:37 pm |
[...] The Lost Art of Correspondence [...]
September 3, 2008 at 6:15 am |
I am now reminded of a visit to Paris several years ago, wandering around the Cimetière du Père Lachaise. Next time I visit I will have a new appreciation for Chopin, thanks.
September 3, 2008 at 8:14 am |
http://www.musanim.com/watch/
Wondered what you would think of this website.
September 3, 2008 at 10:04 am |
Ha! A sketch of the store. Awesome. Chopin is so very David.
September 4, 2008 at 2:48 am |
OH! I have the Chopin letters book as well! I thought it was interesting reading. The man was way beyond his time.