Yesterday I was confronted (not for the first time) by a fact about myself that brought me up short, and which I do not like. I received an email from a woman with whom I have been corresponding on and off for a couple of weeks; clearly she usually sends her correspondence through a spellchecker, but this time either she forgot, or did not have access to it. I think she was also in a bit of a hurry, as the email was less coherent than her past communications have been.
At any rate — it’s been clear to me that she has trouble with homophones, which the spellchecker doesn’t catch at any rate, because they’re not misspellings per se. In the email I read yesterday, she spelled the word “onus” as “owness.” My immediate reaction was to think less of her intelligence, although she had used the word correctly and clearly knows exactly what it means … she just doesn’t know how it’s spelled.
I wonder where and how I started to associate orthography, proper punctuation, and grammar with intelligence. In actual fact, they’re not really related … language mechanics falls more under organizational skill than intelligence. I would not like my intelligence level to be gauged by my inability to do high-school level mathematics; why then am I so reactive about written English?
Oddly enough, my longest relationship was with a woman who was highly intelligent, but who had virtually no writing skills at all. We seldom e-mailed each other, however, so her lack of finesse didn’t bother me. She spoke quite well (though she often failed to use the past perfect tense when it was warranted, which made me insane … she would say “I should have went” instead of “I should have gone”) and was intellectually curious; a great reader, and a fine thinker. But if we’d e-mailed more frequently at the beginning of our relationship, I never would have become involved with her. (That would actually have been a good thing, though not for any reason to do with our intellectual compatibility.)
I am trying to become more aware of these petty judgments as I try to reconsider what I really want and need from friends, and from potential partners. How important should it be to me how well someone writes? As a writer myself, I know that writing well is one of the most manipulative and controlling acts a person can perform, and one of the most compelling ways to deceive. How valuable is it, really, to be with someone who has that skill? And why am I so ready to exercise the inappropriate control of judgment?
I guess the owness is on me to figure all that out.
January 6, 2008 at 12:19 pm |
Oh, David! How I can relate to this. A few years ago, Craigslist was actually a place to find interesting romantic prospects. I’d post a personal ad, then give into a froth of contempt while reading responses, 90% of which were replete with crimes against English. It doesn’t help that e-mail is such a lazy medium and hardly anyone bothers to capitalize or write complete sentences. I always thought that I’d need someone with a great command of the language because I so enjoy quick, sharp banter and irony and double entendres and other little flourishes of cleverness. So here’s my husband… a reader only of history and user manuals… the most literal thinker I’ve ever met… English not even his first language. And though his speech, to my ear, is very nearly impeccable, the man could not have courted me with the written word to save his life. The cards he writes to me on special occasions are full of spelling and grammar mistakes.
Since we’re talking lately about spiritual matters, I have only this to say… if there is a spiritual bone in my body, if I can summon faith in a single otherwordly sort of belief, it’s that he’s my guardian angel. And that it’s no accident that he arrived in the form of a man who can’t talk that talk, or write that kind of seduction.
Insofar as we both use words as smoke and mirrors to a certain extent, maybe we both need our most essential partners not to fully partake of that medium… could that be possible?
January 6, 2008 at 5:06 pm |
[...] of one’s self esteem be well supported. Thus, we see intelligent people set up criteria for measuring intelligence which they satisfy. Further, they inadvertently occasionally apply those criteria to others. Yeah. [...]
January 6, 2008 at 7:46 pm |
That stuff drives me batty two. I could of went off of the deep end a few days ago when I seen this guy in a restaurant talking about how he “come home yesterday.” What a dummy! At one point I almost through my fork at him. But I knew he would’ve came over and hit me so I didn’t. But seriously, people who can’t talk good make me nuts. Its just not alright. But then, not everyone can be smart like me and you.
January 6, 2008 at 10:11 pm |
I was teaching a woman in her sixties how to use email. She already had an email account, knew the basics of how to use it, and was obviously an intelligent and literate person.
I also gradually became aware that she was filled with anxiety and resentment.
Some gentle questioning revealed the source of her distress. She was a retired grade school teacher who took great pride in her ability to spell correctly and to write grammatically correct sentences.
However, she had never learned how to touch type or to perform word processing and text editing on a computer. She would start writing an email, notice an error, get herself hopelessly tangled trying to correct the error, and finally abort her email in tears. The thought of sending a less than correct letter to a friend filled her with horror and shame.
January 6, 2008 at 10:34 pm |
I feel your pain David. I was raised by grammar Nazis.
January 7, 2008 at 12:11 am |
PJ’s comment had me rolling on the floor… well, not literally. I’m too lazy to actually get off of the couch to do so.
David, I think that, when you are getting to know someone through a specific medium, you have to set sorting criteria that are appropriate to the medium, especially if the correspondence will continue in that way. I don’t think it makes you an elitist… it just means that what you’re looking for is different from what someone else may be looking for. On the other hand, if the sorting criteria are different for a different situation, like someone you meet and get to know in person… that works well, too. At worst, you end up with a variety of types of people in your life.
Personally, I plan to continue to be entirely picky but not judgmental as regards orthography. On the other hand, an occasional homophonic mix up… well, I can hardly criticize, since I can be the queen of ‘they’re / there / their’ issues.
January 7, 2008 at 1:22 am |
I AM a grammar Nazi. If I make a mistake, it’s usually a typo. People don’t even go to a dictionary if they have a question; they just ask me. However, I don’t look upon my ability to spell better than most or to put sentences together better, or to know the proper use of homophones as a sign that I’m more intelligent. In fact, I kind of look at this as a novelty. I know that I’m not more intelligent; I’m just a homophoniac.
January 7, 2008 at 5:20 am |
I can’t control my apostrophe’s. They show up in crazy places, other time’s fail to show at all. I sort of understand the rules, but for some reason, it doesnt’ align in my writing brain, so I have apostrophe problems all over my writing. I almost wish I could have terrible spelling instead; itd be damn easier than catching little dashe’s showing up wherever they feel like it.
Larry McMurtry’s Godwin Lloyd-Jons had this to say about writers:
“One is foolish to feel sorry for writers. They’re all fucking liars, and they fatten on pain. Also, they invariably steal women.”
January 7, 2008 at 7:43 am |
The comments here are well, scary. My grammar is crap as is my spelling. Whats worse, is the incredibly long run-on sentences I often create are to be feared. But do I give a shit? Absolutely not. As long as the meaning behind my words are understood and others understand that my heart’s in the right place depite my grammatical deficiencies? Its all I care about. Hugs
January 7, 2008 at 10:37 am |
A recent mass-email from the regional manager at work included the following sentence (I’ll spare you the all-caps typographical treatment he favors): “In lieu of these storms systems I just want to make sure everyone that has procedures put in place in case there are any power outs, and that you are ready to roll them out if that should be the eventually.”
The goobers there are all his. You can be assured that I have rendered the sentence accurately because I have a printout of the email here next to me. I have all of them. I figure I’ll need them one day–for evidence.
January 7, 2008 at 11:25 am |
*peeking around the corner and speaking quietly* Oh my! My blog and comments must make you nuts!
*ducking away*
January 7, 2008 at 11:26 am |
Dan, that’s just scary. While I’m prepared to be flexible regarding grammar and spelling, the level of incomprehensibility displayed in your example really is… well … uh … I think “stupid” is, in fact, the word I’m looking for.
January 7, 2008 at 11:26 am |
Shawn, don’t be silly.
Of course it doesn’t, and they don’t.
January 7, 2008 at 11:27 am |
I have known some very brilliant people with learning disabilities that make it extremely difficult for them to spell appropriately. I’ve known really bad spellers who are articulate, funny, sensitive and gifted in many other arenas. I was always an ace speller and used to have that prejudice, but as a psychologist I’ve learned to distinguish the many types of intelligences, emotional as well as cognitive people can have. And I make a ton of typos on both comments and email. I’m being really careful hear.
January 7, 2008 at 11:28 am |
C’hele, that’s my point exactly. And the really odd thing is that I have never been reactionary in this way toward bloggers, or my ‘net friends. Thus I think my foolish reactivity is a way to keep people at a distance if I am likely to meet them personally.
January 7, 2008 at 11:50 am |
January 7, 2008 at 12:08 pm |
At a certain age, people should take the trouble to recognize their faults and weaknesses.
At that point they should make a decision of whether to correct those faults.
If the answer is “yes,” than they should devote themselves to self-improvement with great determination, diligence, dexterity, domination, damn straight I ran out of “d’s”.
If the answer is “no” they should devote themselves to being honest, straightforward, unapologetic, and self-effacing about it.
As long as each of us follows these excellent guidelines, we should each cut each other a reasonable amount of slack on this issues. (Little known fact: this is the correct meaning of the word “slacker.” Other uses must immediately stop.)
Even as I wrote these sort of brilliant thoughts, I realized much more needs to be developed along these lines.
For example, faults such as bad grammar may be irritating, and inappropriate for certain types of employment, they seldom lead to real harm to other people in a social context.
Other faults, however, such as being a crappy parent, are genuinely harmful. If you realize you have such a fault, and cannot remedy it fairly expeditiously, you then should commit suicide.
David, who sometimes contemplates suicide, would be less tempted to do so.
If I keep going in this vein, I will have written an entire philosophy of post-modern ethics. However, instead, I am going to bed and tomorrow I will see if I can get the headlights on my car fixed again (because mice chew the wiring under the hood) as I am growing weary of driving at night without headlights. I am sure the Highway Patrol will not be amused as soon as they spot me proceeding in this fashion. So much for modern ethics.
January 7, 2008 at 12:15 pm |
I love to write but I’m a perfectionist and I want my writing to be perfect…this feeling prevents me from doing as much writing as I wish I were doing.
I read your posts and it just amazes me the way you express yourself. I read the comments and I am also blown away.
The reason is that I grew up learning two languages and I can’t seem to write in either one of them. I am always afraid of ‘The Reader’ and his observations. I also get confused with what rule applies to which language.
Well to make this short, I read a book which goes against all grammar books and rules and orthography and homophones and whatever, and the main message there is to write. It did make me feel frustrated at times, but it has a profound message which I believe is true.
‘IF YOU WANT TO WRITE
A Book about Art, Independence and Spirit’
By: Brenda Ueland
January 7, 2008 at 12:39 pm |
Mr. Random — So the moral is that good grammar makes life worth living? (That is what you said, isn’t it?)
Julia — Perfectionism is indeed the enemy of art. The other really weird thing about this judgmental quirk of mine is that it never asserts itself when I am coaching writers. I am very easily able to separate creative ability from editing ability — I’m a born editor, and not particularly creative. I will forgive a creative storyteller any error of mechanics or execution,and consider it a privilege to do judicious cleanup.
So I think my problem is almost entirely social, which isn’t really surprising, all things considered.
January 7, 2008 at 9:25 pm |
David,
Until something better comes along. Such as a complete sentence.
January 7, 2008 at 11:19 pm |
I often don’t bother reading anything that I find more than two errors in. I just stop reading it, or paying attention to what they’re saying. I don’t think that it’s about intelligence or my presumed lack thereof. In my case, I find that I don’t want to be bothered with anyone that won’t take the time to make their point through correct grammar or correct spelling. I’m not stuffy. But things like the “I should have went” would drive me crazy. And it does.
January 7, 2008 at 11:50 pm |
Sorry if that was too weird of a link back.
My intended point was that I think it is natural for someone to momentarily judge some one harshly based on a lack of what seems to the judging person to be trivial abilities.
I’m often able to gloss over typos but it takes me longer to get over judging someone who isn’t mathematically negatively.
So, you’re just as normal as me.
January 8, 2008 at 12:14 am |
No need to apologize … I was actually more amused than anything to see an incoming link to a post titled “The Art of the Double Standard.” My protest was meant to be ham on wry.
I can’t remember whether I ever answered your question about the RSS thing … the answer is that I don’t know how I did that. I think it might be an option now on the Profile page, but I’m not sure.
January 8, 2008 at 2:47 am |
“PJ’s comment had me rolling on the floor”
I so love hearing that. Making people roll is my goal in life.
Not to be confused with making heads roll, of course.
January 9, 2008 at 5:59 am |
I completely lost out on both English and French grammar classes (I’m bilingual), since I spent a certain amount of years traveling between Montreal and Israel — and incidentally learning Hebrew as well, since I attended regular school there. My understanding of all three language in both spoken and written form is purely instinctual and average at best.
Amuirin made me laugh with her mention of random apostrophes, because I’m certainly guilty of that and I also make common mistakes due to my bilingualism, for instance when I write “appartment” that way because that’s how it’s spelled in French. Let’s not even talk about grammar and syntax, and the amount and kind of typos I make sometimes make me want to crawl under my desk.
My mum who is a writer made me take dictation at home for a number of years, but in French only, fearing that I would lose that language altogether otherwise. She is one of those people who’s [there's a tricky one] read the dictionary backward and forward, and memorized it as a break from her usual reading fare, so I’ve always felt like a dummy in comparison.
But then, much like elissa, I trolled on Craigslist for awhile and LL too (but let’s not delve on that). I was a complete snob and intransigent to the point of simply not replying to candidates who sent me introductory notes that were less than perfect by my standards. In fact, I didn’t limit myself to spelling, grammar and syntax but the notes had to be witty, engaging and creative as well. (Did you know,,,,,,,, some people are,,,,,,, like,,, compelled to use,,,,, lots and lots of commas,,,,,,?)
I know I purposefully set the filter to a very low tolerance in order to keep out just about everybody. As Tiv says, there are all kinds of forms of intelligence out there, it’s just a question of determining what your tolerance level should be according to your wants and needs.
January 11, 2008 at 6:03 pm |
[...] has a thoughtful, eloquently written piece on intellectual elitism here. From Quotidian [...]
January 14, 2008 at 9:17 pm |
Very interesting post! I think we all are a little guilty from time to time for equating intelligence with grammar. For those of us that do this, I suspect it’s because we take the time to check what we’ve typed, formulate a coherent argument, and take pride in what we wrote. Not that the other person doesn’t, but why can’t they do the same?
Or at least us Firefox